Third-party vs. in-house testing: what the difference means

Two documents can carry the same headline number and mean different things. The issuer of the analysis decides how much a result can be independently confirmed.

Research-use scope. This page explains documents and terminology. It is not for use in people or animals, contains no handling or procedural guidance, and does not replace the receiving laboratory's own acceptance criteria.

Who performed the analysis

Third-party (independent) testingIn-house testing
IssuerA laboratory unaffiliated with the supplier issues the certificate under its own name and certificate number.The supplier, or a laboratory it controls, produces the report.
VerificationThe certificate number can be confirmed with the issuing laboratory's own verification page.Only the supplier can vouch for the document.
Method statementStated on the certificate by the laboratory that ran it.Stated by the supplier; may or may not follow a published procedure.
What it supportsAn independently confirmable result for the stated sample, lot, and date.A supplier-asserted result; useful, but not independently confirmable.

How to tell which one you are reading

Why the distinction matters for a receiving laboratory

A receiving log records what can be verified. A third-party certificate can be checked against the issuer's record and filed with the verification date; an in-house summary can only be filed as a supplier statement. Both can be kept; they should not be recorded as the same kind of evidence.

Limits that apply to both

On Arctic Lab Supply reports. Published batch reports are issued by an independent testing laboratory, listed in the batch COA library with the certificate number and a direct link to the laboratory's verification page, and never reused across products, strengths, or lots. How the library is maintained is described in how batch documentation is published.

Related documentation